How the Transparent voting system
handles
security
Transparent
voting is secured by the voters who will validate their ballots.
Current systems must be validated by a government agency. The
voters will provide several times the validation currently
provided. The system also provides for special test votes to be
processed through the system so that election officials can trivially
audit for proper operation.
Transparent voting is designed to be an open system with respect to
public review. Rather than being "open source" (meaning that anyone can
modify the system), the logic of this system will be available, but we
will be taking care of any modifications necessary. This
means that the logic of its design will be validated by countless
experts. This also means that the process of converting the
design into a program that runs on a computer (a process called
compiling or building) can be observed and validated by experts.
In addition, Transparent voting allows an electronic ballot to be
prepared
outside the voting facility. This means that properly prepared
mail-in (absentee) ballots can
be easily entered on Election Day. Once the absentee ballot is
processed, that voter's name can be struck from the list of eligible
voters, preventing an illegal vote from being cast
at the voting facility. This also allows a voter to trivially
declare that
they will not vote, and thus eliminates the possibility of a third
party presuming to vote for such a voter.
Finally, votes are most susceptible to tampering at the central
computer where the votes are stored. Most electronic voting
systems have vulnerabilities in a significant number if not all polling
places. Even though tampering will be revealed by the nature of
this system, it is still better to have fewer places where the system
is vulnerable. Even these risks will be extremely limited.
The only sort of information which can come into the central computer
are the votes which are being received as part of an election, requests
from voters who want to see how their votes are recorded, and requests
for the count of votes (election results). The central computer
will not be connected to machines outside their secure facility in a
general sense and will not be susceptible to the tampering and hacking
from the world wide web which plagues so many computers. Any
tampering with the central computer would have to be performed by
persons at the secure facility - presumably persons very willing to go
to prison.
Back to main page